Where the earth is broken down..

The long, long bus ride north, the twenty something hours, the shitty food and the breakdown, the standing in the slim shadow of the bus waiting for a new bus while watching the drivers harass a massive tarantula with their pens; it was all for the sake of a visit to Calama, a mining town in the Atacama Desert.

Calama exists because Chuquicamata exists. Chuquicamata exists because the desert rocks in northern Chile contain trace amounts of copper, which if exploited on a large enough scale can be worth millions. Che Guevara had visited Chuqui back when it was owned by the (American) Anaconda Copper Mining Company, and when the mining had been done by impoverished, unskilled miners. Guevara had not been welcome at the time; he was told it was not a tourist site.

In the interim between Guevara’s visit and mine, Chuqui had been nationalised, the miners’ conditions had improved, the scope of the operation had increased dramatically, and daily tours had started running.

The mine today is immense and awe-inspiring. The name and ownership may have changed, but the ruthlessness of The Company in hasn’t. It is still in the business of refining desert stone and human labour and invested dollars and pesos and petrol and smoke and heat into copper and eventually into money. The vision of the company is immense; this is where the earth is broken down, where everything is viewed as transformable and manipulatable and exploitable.

My host in Calama had grown up around the mines. Twenty years ago there had been a village for the miners at Chuquicamata. They had been paid quite well, albeit in company credits instead of in currency, and had been provided with the best medical centre in South America, stocked with American doctors and pharmaceuticals.

Today that village is abandoned. Christmas decorations still hang around the town plaza, but the windows of the houses are boarded up, the church and the cinema are barred, and the old furniture lies in broken heaps of junk. For The Company, even towns are temporary, malleable things; when it was discovered that the stone upon which the town was built contained copper, the entire population was relocated to Calama so that the town could be broken down and its mineral wealth extracted.

Calama has a strange feel to it. Part of this is the high ratio of men to women. Many miners have families in distant towns. The families that do live in town only have young kids. There are very few twenty-soemthings around. There is no university in town and few prospects other than mining. The town is full of tough, ugly bars and clubs, auto workshops and masculine cars. The road from the town to the mine is lined with shrines commemorating car accident victims.

The people in Calama have their diversions, but there is still a forlorn feeling about the town. The Company provides for its employees, but not too much. Most of the profits and revenue from the mines end up in the bigger towns like Antofagasta, from which the copper is sent around the world. Calama is a town that exists to fuel the mine, but it won’t do so forever; there is copper in the stone beneath Calama too, and eventually this town will also be ground down and consumed by the expanding pit to fuel the continuing need for copper, and for profits.

Eventually there will be no more copper. Currently the mine is 4km long, 3 wide, and almost 1 deep. Calama is 16km away and all of the land in between contains copper. When the area is depleted of its resources The Company will pull out and whatever towns remains will either be abandoned, or will finally assume a sense of permanency. But while there is money to be made nothing can be considered permanent, and the only certainty will be the expanding of the pit, and breaking down of the earth into its sellable, profitable resources. It is a terrible, grim view of the world. And when there is nothing left worth exploiting, what will we be left with? Where will we turn our hungry gaze?

How Chile had changed.

My second flight straight across the Pacific, ricocheting off of Auckland and back through time to land in Santiago two hours and five films after i had left. I dreaded the arrivals gate in Santiago, where i vaguely recalled a crush of taxi touts, and backpackers being bundled in $50+ shuttles. There was no crush though, and there were no troubles as i connected from bus to bus, and made my way to Valparaiso.

The moment i looked out the window of that first bus, Chile came flooding back to me. The downtrodden concretey buildings close to the airport, the horses browsing in empty lots, the clusters of leaning shanties, the men idle in the streets and around the bus stations.

At the first bus station i remembered flaky empanadas con queso, and remembered how underwhelming they could be. I remembered sodas with names like Kem, Pap and BIlz, and discovered that they weren’t owned by Coca-Cola. This disposed me towards them, until i remembered their flavours; all of unidenitifiable fruits blended with buckets of sugar and colouring.

I remembered the couples making out loudly in public, pretending no one else in the world existed. I remembered the studied seriousness of their faces as they stared into each other. I remembered that every park and plaza was full of intertwined couples.

I had never forgotten the dogs that lay everywhere, puddles of drool forming on the ground around their jowls. They lay wherever they fell, in the middle of sidewalks and plazas. They moved for no one. I discovered that Chile has cats as well as dogs, but that they band together and occupy particular blocks or parks. And they do not fall asleep in the middle of the street.

I remembered the frontier feel of the country, remote and wild. I remembered the dry earth and the towering mountains. Horses are still important here, so are cowboy hats. I remembered the grit of the country, a blue collar country, driven by its mines, its farms, it ports. I remembered the throngs of men in caps at bus stations, and how loudly they laughed at the films on the bus TV, and how loudly they snored.

But the moment i was off the bus in Valparaiso, i felt that Chile had changed. Three years ago school students had called out to us as though we were the first gringos they had seen. The hostels had been full of backpackers but the streets had seemed devoid of them. Valparaiso, though, was full of expats. Teachers and students and volunteers mingled with the artsy locals and filled the cafes and bars and houses, clinging to their glasses as they watched votes pour in and states turn blue or red.

Last time we had come to Chile for the natural beauty. The cities were gritty but the countryside was sublime. Returning i found that the cities – or such as i saw of them – had grown up. Valparaiso was full of fantastic street art. The strong traditional of Latin American murals was fusing with contemporary street art. The old didactic paintings had become fun and clever. They still expressed joy and pain, but they did so with freedom now. Cats, birds, monsters and musicians covered every available vertical surface.

In Santiago a neighbourhood had emerged that i’d completely overlooked on my first wide-eyed discovery of the city. This was Bellavista, clustered around one of Pablo Neruda’s homes; the only part of weekend Santiago that was bustling and thumping and laughing and cramming into bars and restaurants. Here in Bellavista the full and emerging diversity of Chile was on display. Across the aisle from the perennial punk and heavy metal favourites that resound throughout South America were Japanese anime DVDs. The monopoly of Chilean cuisine – hotdog, hamburger, sandwich, steak – was being broken by sushi, curry and kimchi. The pink and white of Harajuku girls broke up the ubiquitous black clothing.

The Chileans of Santiago seemed to have changed too. They had learned English. They were no longer shy. They invited me to stay with them, to come out the clubs. They bought me drinks. This was not the Chile i had discovered last time. Previously it had been all museums and hostels. Returning, i spent maybe 30 minutes in one museum and nothing more.

In three years Chile seemed to have changed dramatically, but of course it had not. Santiago had been the first destination of my first big trip. Back then i hadn’t spoken to a single Chilean, and had depended on guide books to get me about. I had avoided the subway and the bars. I had been shy about taking photos.

The change was all mine: I had learned to see and to speak, and i had a broader basis for comparison. I had learned travel arrogance, to flip my camera out whenever and wherever i wanted. I had discovered couchsurfing and used it to insinuate my way deeper into the countries i visited. I had enlarged my vocabulary and could ask for directions instead of pouring over maps.

No doubt Chile had changed too, but returning i found i could only map my own changes. How much bigger and stronger and brasher i had become. How much more i knew, how much more presumptuous and over-confident i was. Before leaving Santiago and heading north into the desert i climbed Cerro Santa Lucia again. I looked out over the same city and up into the same Andes. Where before i had been daunted and awestruck, now i was dissecting the place, weighing it up, reducing it to blogs and wondering whether i would want to live there.

The big change of the last few years is that i’ve become a ’serious’ traveller; one of the people who talks too loudly about his own travels and can compare every new site or sight to at least three previously-seen ones. It’s getting harder to be surprised or impressed. I guess this is a common paradox for long-term travellers. Is there a solution to it? Is this why people are always seeking bigger, more terrifying, more remote parts of the world? To try and outrun their desensitisation? From Santiago i ran on north into the deserts, to see if i could do the same…

Among the Scientologists

There seem to be less and less free things to do in the world. More and more ticket and toll boothes are sprouting up everywhere, barring access and demanding small change. Even churches are starting to demand small entry fees; if not to the church itself then often to towers, cloisters or catacombs. Or they let you in but you have to pay to have the lights turned on over the altar or reliquary or whatever you have come to see.

Early one morning in suburban St Louis, though, i stumbled upon a church that did offer free entertainment. On a street that contained two synagogues, a masonic hall, and about three Christian churches, there was one other building; the only one with its door open and a welcome sign out front. It was the church of Scientology, and they were offering free personality tests.

The results of that first test were surprising to me. While i scored positively for my certainty, activity and aggression, my lowest score, languishing somewhere around negative 30, was happiness. How could i be unhappy? i was in the middle of a three month jaunt across the USofA, catching up with friends and discovering all the glorious weirdness that the midwest could offer.

At the end of the trip i tried again in San Francisco, and found the results more or less the same. My happiness had climbed slightly, my communication level had plummeted. Was i still so unhappy? Could i trust these personality tests, or the counsellors that tried to explain why scientology could help with my apparent unhappiness?

There are no churches of Scientology in South Korea. If the current prosperity of the country continues, then Scientology will soon follow, but for a whole year i had no mathematical value my happiness. I didn’t know what to think; whether to smile or cry.

Fortunately there is a church in Sydney, and while i was visiting home and preparing for the next jaunt, i paid a quick visit, and took another test.

Success! Where in the past my graphed personality consisted of wildly varying figures, of sharp inclines and declines, in Sydney my personality was plateauing into positivity. My happiness had leaped in positive figures. it was still my second-lowest score, but now it sat smugly in the ‘acceptable under perfect conditions’ range.

The only low was my appreciation level, which i was told meant i wasn’t socialising properly (and that Scientology had a book that could help). For that i blamed all those hours hunched over a laptop battering away at a manuscript.

But now the manuscript is done, and my bag is packed, and i am on the road again. And i am probably on the right road, because finally and supposedly and apparently and according to this report and assuming i can trust the Scientological conditions and definitions used in the test, I am happy. I have 16 whole points of happiness.

And I am told there are plenty of churches of Scientology in South America…